Integrated Risk Framework berbasis GIS–MCDA untuk Mengatasi Fragmentasi Risiko Iklim dan Bencana pada Infrastruktur Kritis

Main Article Content

Baiq Virgia Srihayati
Lalu Ibrohim Burhan

Abstract

Perubahan iklim dan peningkatan frekuensi multi-bencana telah meningkatkan tekanan terhadap keberlanjutan infrastruktur kritis dan kontinuitas layanan publik di berbagai wilayah. Meskipun berbagai penelitian telah mengembangkan analisis risiko berbasis GIS dan multi-hazard, pendekatan yang digunakan masih cenderung sektoral dan terpisah sehingga belum mampu menangkap interaksi lintas risiko, keterkaitan antar infrastruktur, dan efek sistemik secara komprehensif. Penelitian ini bertujuan menyusun Integrated Climate and Disaster Risk Framework berbasis Resilience Theory dan Integrated Risk Theory untuk meningkatkan efektivitas perencanaan ketahanan infrastruktur kritis terhadap ancaman iklim dan bencana. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan mix methods sequential explanatory melalui integrasi GIS, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), dan SEM-PLS pada lima sektor infrastruktur kritis, yaitu air bersih, transportasi, energi, kesehatan, dan telekomunikasi. Data penelitian diperoleh dari BMKG, BNPB, InaRISK, survei lapangan, observasi teknis, serta expert judgment. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sektor air bersih memiliki skor risiko tertinggi sebesar 0,81, sedangkan sektor telekomunikasi menunjukkan skor risiko terendah sebesar 0,51. Uji ANOVA menunjukkan perbedaan signifikan tingkat kerentanan antar sektor (F = 8,73; p < 0,01), sementara simulasi mitigasi terintegrasi menghasilkan penurunan kerugian infrastruktur sebesar 34% dibandingkan pendekatan parsial. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pendekatan risiko terpadu mampu meningkatkan akurasi identifikasi hotspot risiko, prioritas mitigasi, dan ketahanan infrastruktur lintas sektor. Temuan ini memperkuat pengembangan teori ketahanan sistemik sekaligus menyediakan kerangka praktis bagi perencanaan infrastruktur tahan iklim dan multi-bencana dalam bidang teknik sipil..


Abstract


Climate change and the increasing frequency of multi-hazard events have intensified pressures on the sustainability of critical infrastructure and the continuity of public services across regions. Although previous studies have developed GIS-based and multi-hazard risk assessments, existing approaches remain largely sectoral and fragmented, limiting their ability to capture cross-risk interactions, infrastructure interdependencies, and systemic effects comprehensively. This study aimed to develop an Integrated Climate and Disaster Risk Framework based on Resilience Theory and Integrated Risk Theory to improve the effectiveness of critical infrastructure resilience planning against climate and disaster threats. The study employed a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach integrating GIS, Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA), and SEM-PLS across five critical infrastructure sectors, including water supply, transportation, energy, healthcare, and telecommunications. Data were collected from BMKG, BNPB, InaRISK, field surveys, technical observations, and expert judgment. The results revealed that the water supply sector exhibited the highest composite risk score (0.81), whereas the telecommunications sector showed the lowest score (0.51). ANOVA testing indicated significant differences in vulnerability levels among infrastructure sectors (F = 8.73; p < 0.01), while integrated mitigation simulations reduced infrastructure losses by 34% compared with partial approaches. The findings demonstrate that integrated risk assessment improves hotspot identification accuracy, mitigation prioritization, and cross-sector infrastructure resilience. This study contributes to the advancement of systemic resilience theory and provides a practical framework for climate-resilient and multi-hazard infrastructure planning in civil engineering.

Article Details

How to Cite
Srihayati, B. V. ., & Burhan, L. I. (2026). Integrated Risk Framework berbasis GIS–MCDA untuk Mengatasi Fragmentasi Risiko Iklim dan Bencana pada Infrastruktur Kritis. DINAMIKA: Jurnal Teknik Sipil Dan Lingkungan, 2(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.63982/dinamika.hee41n91
Section
Articles

How to Cite

Srihayati, B. V. ., & Burhan, L. I. (2026). Integrated Risk Framework berbasis GIS–MCDA untuk Mengatasi Fragmentasi Risiko Iklim dan Bencana pada Infrastruktur Kritis. DINAMIKA: Jurnal Teknik Sipil Dan Lingkungan, 2(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.63982/dinamika.hee41n91

References

Adeyemi, A. B., Komolafe, A. A., Nakalembe, C. L., Ismaila, R. O., Adebayo, A. D., & Babayemi, O. E. (2024). Integrated GIS-Based MCDA and Machine Learning Techniques in Flood Susceptibility Mapping in Ala River Basin, Nigeria. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4863685/v1

Afsari, R., Nadizadeh Shorabeh, S., Kouhnavard, M., Homaee, M., & Arsanjani, J. J. (2022). A Spatial Decision Support Approach for Flood Vulnerability Analysis in Urban Areas: A Case Study of Tehran. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 11(7), 380. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11070380

Caldera, S., Mostafa, S., Desha, C., & Mohamed, S. (2021). Integrating disaster management planning into road infrastructure asset management. Infrastructure Asset Management, 8(4), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1680/jinam.21.00012

Cheewinsiriwat, P., Langkulsen, U., Lertwattanamongkol, V., Poompongthai, W., Lambonmung, A., Chamchan, C., Boonmanunt, S., Nakhapakorn, K., & Moses, C. (2024). Assessing Coastal Vulnerability to Climate Change: A Case Study of Nakhon Si Thammarat and Krabi. Social Sciences, 13(3), 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13030142

Cima Vergara, M. A. (2024). Vulnerabilidad del Área Metropolitana de Valparaíso ante incendios. Revista Planeo, 58. https://doi.org/10.7764/plan.058.135

Das, A., & McAleavy, T. (2025). Unfolding Cascading Disasters: Navigating Complex Risks and Systemic Vulnerabilities for Coordinated Disaster Response. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7419302/v1

Deng, H., & Liu, K. (2023). Spatiotemporal Evolution of Urban Resilience and Spatial Spillover Effects in Guangdong Province, China. Land, 12(9), 1800. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12091800

Dulin, S., Mitoulis, S.-A., Bredikhin, A., Treyz, E., Leung, B., Dykes, J., Karpeles, O., Gurav, S., Karhunen, A., & Linkov, I. (2025). Rethinking infrastructure design from component failure to systemic resilience. Nature Communications, 16(1), 9681. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-64683-6

Faraji, F., Mouratidis, H., & Zakwani, A. Al. (2025). Risk Impact Pathway Analysis (RIPA): A Dynamic Risk Assessment Framework for Interdependent Critical Infrastructures. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-8001498/v1

Gallina, V., Torresan, S., Zabeo, A., Critto, A., Glade, T., & Marcomini, A. (2020). A Multi-Risk Methodology for the Assessment of Climate Change Impacts in Coastal Zones. Sustainability, 12(9), 3697. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093697

Gontte, A. (2024). Review on Potential Urban Development Site Selection Using Geospatial-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) Techniques in the Context of Ethiopia. Science Frontiers, 5(3), 102–109. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20240503.11

Hendricks, M. D., & Zandt, S. V. (2021). Unequal Protection Revisited: Planning for Environmental Justice, Hazard Vulnerability, and Critical Infrastructure in Communities of Color. Environmental Justice, 14(2), 87–97. https://doi.org/10.1089/env.2020.0054

Hussain, M., Tayyab, M., Zhang, J., Shah, A. A., Ullah, K., Mehmood, U., & Al-Shaibah, B. (2021). GIS-Based Multi-Criteria Approach for Flood Vulnerability Assessment and Mapping in District Shangla: Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Sustainability, 13(6), 3126. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063126

Insunza, J., Jiménez, A., & Cerda, C. (2023). Resiliencia urbana multidimensional en contextos de riesgo: estrategias para el Programa “Quiero Mi Barrio” desde el caso “Barrio Olga Leiva” en Peñalolén. EURE, 50(149). https://doi.org/10.7764/EURE.50.149.10

Jarghon, A. E. M., Damayanti, N. A., Dhamanti, I., Notobroto, H. B., Hidajah, A. C., & Awad, A. M. M. (2024). Mapping Vulnerability to Potential Crisis Events in Surabaya City: A GIS-Based Approach. F1000Research, 13, 465. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.145182.2

Kaya, H. D., Schraven, D., Leijten, M., & Chan, P. W. (2025). Unveiling Interdependencies in Infrastructure Transitions: Cross- sectoral Learning in the Water-Energy Nexus. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1554(1), 012140. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1554/1/012140

Kobayashi-Carvalhaes, T., & Ahmad, N. (2023). Initial Systems-Level Assessment of a Distributed Direct Air Capture System Concept at the Urban-scale (UrbanDAC). https://doi.org/10.2172/1997609

Küçükarslan, A. B., Köksal, M., & Ekmekçi, İ. (2024). The Use of Geographic Information Systems and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in the Creation of Forest Fire Susceptibility Maps: A Literature Review. İnsan ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(2), 259–285. https://doi.org/10.53048/johass.1566294

Li, Q., Ni, T., Li, L., Wen, H., & Xu, J. (2025). A probabilistic GIS-based framework for urban flood risk assessment in Chengdu metro network. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 43526. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-27456-1

Li, Z., Song, K., & Peng, L. (2021). Flood Risk Assessment under Land Use and Climate Change in Wuhan City of the Yangtze River Basin, China. Land, 10(8), 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10080878

Linkov, I., Trump, B. D., Trump, J., Pescaroli, G., Hynes, W., Mavrodieva, A., & Panda, A. (2022). Resilience stress testing for critical infrastructure. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 82, 103323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103323

Luu, C., Tran, H. X., Pham, B. T., Al-Ansari, N., Tran, T. Q., Duong, N. Q., Dao, N. H., Nguyen, L. P., Nguyen, H. D., Thu Ta, H., Le, H. Van, & Meding, J. von. (2020). Framework of Spatial Flood Risk Assessment for a Case Study in Quang Binh Province, Vietnam. Sustainability, 12(7), 3058. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073058

Manrique Rueda, G., Dupont, B., & Shearing, C. (2022). Resilient infrastructure in the Anthropocene. https://doi.org/10.31124/advance.19300073

Manyaga, F., Nilufer, N., & Hajaoui, Z. (2020). A Systematic Literature Review on Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Disaster Management. International Journal of Business Ecosystem and Strategy (2687-2293), 2(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.36096/ijbes.v2i2.197

Maskrey, A., Jain, G., & Lavell, A. (2023). The social construction of systemic risk: towards an actionable framework for risk governance. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 32(1), 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-07-2022-0155

Mohanty, S. K., Chatterjee, R., & Shaw, R. (2020). Building Resilience of Critical Infrastructure: A Case of Impacts of Cyclones on the Power Sector in Odisha. Climate, 8(6), 73. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli8060073

Moreno Flores, O. (2021). El paisaje como infraestructura para la resiliencia urbana frente a desastres : el caso de los Parques de Mitigación en la costa centro-sur de Chile post tsunami 2010 = Landscape as infrastructure for urban resilience to disasters : The case of Mitigation. Cuadernos de Investigación Urbanística, 139, 1. https://doi.org/10.20868/ciur.2021.139.4778

Mukhtar, M. A., Shangguan, D., Ding, Y., Anjum, M. N., Banerjee, A., Butt, A. Q., Nilesh yadav, Li, D., Yang, Q., Khan, A. A., Muhammad, A., & He, B. B. (2024). Integrated flood risk assessment in Hunza-Nagar, Pakistan: unifying big climate data analytics and multi-criteria decision-making with GIS. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2024.1337081

Nyimbili, P. H., & Erden, T. (2020). A Hybrid Approach Integrating Entropy-AHP and GIS for Suitability Assessment of Urban Emergency Facilities. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(7), 419. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9070419

Okem, E. S., Nwokediegwu, Z. Q. S., Umoh, A. A., Biu, P. W., Obaedo, B. O., & Sibanda, M. (2024). Civil Engineering and Disaster Resilience: A Review of Innovations in Building Safe and Sustainable Communities. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 11(1), 639–650. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.11.1.0107

Osman, S. A., & Das, J. (2023). GIS-based flood risk assessment using multi-criteria decision analysis of Shebelle River Basin in southern Somalia. SN Applied Sciences, 5(5), 134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-023-05360-5

Paredes Gaibor, D. S., Montero Jiménez, J. F., & Palacios Vélez, J. L. (2024). Análisis de la vulnerabilidad de infraestructuras críticas como represas, puentes y carreteras ante eventos asociados al fenómeno de: El Niño – Oscilación Sur en la Costa ecuatoriana. AlfaPublicaciones, 6(1.1), 45–61. https://doi.org/10.33262/ap.v6i1.1.454

Pescaroli, G., Guida, K., Reynolds, J., Pulwarty, R. S., Linkov, I., & Alexander, D. E. (2023). Managing systemic risk in emergency management, organizational resilience and climate change adaptation. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 32(1), 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPM-08-2022-0179

Prihartanto, E., Rohman, M. A., & Wiguna, I. P. A. (2023). Assessment of airport conditions in resilience efforts: A review. E3S Web of Conferences, 429, 03001. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202342903001

Quiroz-Del Pezo, S., & Olives-Maldonado, J. (2023). GIRD y la vulnerabilidad socioeconómica en la comuna Las Balsas de la parroquia Colonche, 2022. 593 Digital Publisher CEIT, 8(4), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.33386/593dp.2023.4.1895

Rajarethinam, K., & Devadas, V. (2021). Water Resilience Mapping of Chennai, India Using Analytical Hierarchy Process. Ecological Processes, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-021-00341-1

Rezaei, H., Macioszek, E., Derakhshesh, P., Houshyar, H., Ghabouli, E., Bakhshi Lomer, A. R., Ghanbari, R., & Esmailzadeh, A. (2023). A Spatial Decision Support System for Modeling Urban Resilience to Natural Hazards. Sustainability, 15(11), 8777. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118777

Rivière, M., Lenglet, J., Noirault, A., Pimont, F., & Dupuy, J. (2023). Mapping territorial vulnerability to wildfires: A participative multi-criteria analysis. Forest Ecology and Management, 539, 121014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2023.121014

Rodríguez Rodríguez, I., Campo Valera, M., & Calderón Fajardo, V. (2023). Conectando el Futuro: Ciudades Inteligentes, IoT y la Transformación de la Sociedad Urbana. UMA Editorial. https://doi.org/10.24310/mumaedmumaed.27

Santoro, F. M., Silva, M. M. d., Fernandes, A., & Toscano, B. (2022). A Domain Ontology on Cascading Effects in Critical Infrastructures Based on a Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 18(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijcis.2022.10044304

Schnittfinke, T., Greiving, S., Nyamai, D. N., Scholz, W., Schramm, S., Behrens, R., Zuidgeest, M., Rink, B., Momm, S., Travassos, L., Brauer, B., & Fischer, L. (2024). Criticality assessment and cascading effects: impacts of COVID-19 disruptions in public transport on marginalized groups in Dortmund, Germany, São Paulo, Brazil, and Cape Town, South Africa. Journal of Surveillance, Security and Safety, 5(3), 140–159. https://doi.org/10.20517/jsss.2024.11

Schweikert, A. E., & Deinert, M. R. (2021). Vulnerability and resilience of power systems infrastructure to natural hazards and climate change. WIREs Climate Change, 12(5). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.724

Shamsi, N., & Helmrich, A. (2025). Interdependency classification: a framework for infrastructure resilience. Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability, 5(1), 015009. https://doi.org/10.1088/2634-4505/adac89

Simpson, N. P., Mach, K. J., Constable, A., Hess, J., Hogarth, R., Howden, M., Lawrence, J., Lempert, R. J., Muccione, V., Mackey, B., New, M. G., O’Neill, B., Otto, F., Pörtner, H., Reisinger, A., Roberts, D., Schmidt, D. N., Seneviratne, S., Strongin, S., … Trisos, C. H. (2021). A framework for complex climate change risk assessment. One Earth, 4(4), 489–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oneear.2021.03.005

Stanković, A. M., Tomsovic, K. L., De Caro, F., Braun, M., Chow, J. H., Čukalevski, N., Dobson, I., Eto, J., Fink, B., Hachmann, C., Hill, D., Ji, C., Kavicky, J. A., Levi, V., Liu, C., Mili, L., Moreno, R., Panteli, M., Petit, F. D., … Zhao, S. (2023). Methods for Analysis and Quantification of Power System Resilience. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 38(5), 4774–4787. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2022.3212688

Tempa, K. (2022). District flood vulnerability assessment using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with historical flood events in Bhutan. PLOS ONE, 17(6), e0270467. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270467

Verschuur, J., Fernández-Pérez, A., Mühlhofer, E., Nirandjan, S., Borgomeo, E., Becher, O., Voskaki, A., Oughton, E. J., Stankovski, A., Greco, S. F., Koks, E. E., Pant, R., & Hall, J. W. (2024). Quantifying climate risks to infrastructure systems: A comparative review of developments across infrastructure sectors. PLOS Climate, 3(4), e0000331. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000331

Verschuur, J., Pant, R., Koks, E., & Hall, J. (2022). A systemic risk framework to improve the resilience of port and supply-chain networks to natural hazards. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 24(3), 489–506. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-021-00204-8

Villagrán, C.-P., & Soto, M.-V. (2024). Vías de Evacuación e Infraestructura Crítica para la Gestión del Riesgo de Tsunamis en la ciudad de La Serena, Chile. Revista de Estudios Latinoamericanos Sobre Reducción Del Riesgo de Desastres REDER, 8(1), 151. https://doi.org/10.55467/reder.v8i1.144